As to the dynamics of the evolving brain and intelligence, there's the possibility of a dynamic due to the frequency reception of the brain that intelligence gaps within the animal kingdom is due to the frequency and wavelength at which such brains are sensative to the EM field in which they are in. Now this would be a highly complex subject, but I could think of some potential anaologies as with the processing power of a computer vs the frequency aspects of it's processor and such.
Now here’s an opportunity to show why computers and brains are so drastically different, Tim. In the simplest relational analogies of dead computers and dead brains, we could make such relational analogies of computer hardware and software systems functioning similar to the CIA, or central intelligence agency, of the brain__but we’d be leaving out the most critical ‘central dynamic functions’, that produce the major differences between computer processors and brain processors__computers have static/fixed hardware and software systems__yes, they do allow dynamic processes to happen and be processed within them__but they do not accommodate the changing, re-arranging and re-building on the fly__of even their software, and especially not their hardware__whereas brains actually accommodate both, extremely fluidically. Now, this may seem strange and impossible upon first seeing me state this, but follow the argument closely__as the only way to describe these important differences, imo, is to go right back to the areas you are trying to avoid__the dynamics of human thought processes, processings and the ability to think and change all processes, within other processes on the fly__and the ‘biggie’, to change how the hardware itself does all the processing__by the ‘Free-Will-I-Self’, being able to move freely from hardware house to hardware house, or agent to agent and back to CIA, the central intelligence agency of perception__At totally free-will mechanics and actions… You simply don’t see this extra multiplication of processing capacities, if you are thinking the brain processes in such fixed capacity states as simple computers…
Further, in order to see the simplicity of the complexity I’ve just stated, which is far beyond the simple capacity of fixed CPU’s and other software and hardware houses/systems of computers__which is totally position fixed, where technicians and possibly yourself, built and installed the hardware and software__the brain has no fixed position for the ‘I-Self’ to be locked down say as to the central processor’s absolutely fixed position, and the software’s fixed positions on the hard-drive, memory or in add-on graphics, modem cards and such__which are all still fixed positions__whereas the brain has only one fixed position, which seems to be perception__which is the largest neural network, encompassing the entire neural system of the entire brain/mind__yet science also knows it has a CIA at the fixed point within the lower center of the brain, which was discovered by brain injured patients being studied and tested, as per the ventral and dorsal canals leading to the physical perception bio-organ, I mentioned earlier, to eliminate other possibilities__but as to where the brain’s processing ‘can’ fully take place, there’s no known fixed point__as experiments by neuro-science has shown the brain lighting up, at different times, just about everywhere, and at different places within different test patients__and now to bring this down to Earth, by the simple self-common-sense processings, you and I are more personally familiar with__Our brains can simply sit in the intuitive observer position, act within our brain’s psychology processing system, or operate/act within our brain’s logic systems, etc.__These are just three simply known separate processing functions and areas of the brain, we are all familiar with__but, this list can be extended in function to millions of dynamic inter-actions, from all the brain’s self-choosing processing activities and areas__which are multiplied by the processes of the inter-acting em-fields of the mobile ‘I-Self’, within the larger perception network__which computers just do not have, nor can these functions be built into computers__as they produce far too many complexities, programmers are simply incapable of copying, as they far exceed man’s present mathematical capacities__and will far into the future, from where my research efforts have looked__due to the mobile em-field multiplication capabilities and capacities of function, of living intelligent brains/minds… Tim, this is all part of history’s long epistemological and semeiological investigations and modelings of the mind’s mental inference mechanics, by some of the world’s greatest logicians, semeioticians, and mathematicians__that easily feeds directly into the accuracies of modern quantum mechanics’ studies, knowledge and facts__as the best QM’ers still use this information as their foundations__just as did, Planck, Einstein, Heisenberg, Dirac, and Schrodenger, just to mention a few__as I’ve studied the background thoughts of these great thinkers…
Tim, now let me explain the above more, in our personal language terms. You’ve known since early childhood you could observe your real inner self possibly existing within mental states of judgment, non-judgment, feelings, logic, psychology, will, emotions, reason, fear, confidence, love, hate, pain, happiness, etc., etc., etc., on and on__and you probably further tried to figure out where and who you really were inside or outside this ball o’ mush, sitting atop our shoulders__as most any child or young adult did, at one time or another, and possibly even still as an adult, do__but, you probably never considered tha ‘I-Self’ you are looking for, as its ‘True-North’ position, may just be a ‘Position of No Fixed Position’, but one of ‘Dynamic Positioning’, having the capacity of “Total I-Self Positioning” within any of the many above mentioned brain agents(allowing the extended ability to ‘self-multiply’ the self-processing capacity to almost un-imaginable heights), or even leaving and returning to the ‘CIA’ of our lil’ ol’ pea brains’ central processor(where such a model sure can explain a lot of the confused and conflated mechanics between East and West ‘one and many’ thinkings’ probs). Imo, when you can see the brain functioning in this “Dynamic Total I-Self Positioning” method__then and only then does the brain/mind become free enough to see its total own self-functioning interence mechanics, as a complex process__yet far easier understood as a totally dynamic process__then and only then, can you also see its far superior power over simple computers and black-hole mechanics__which can never choose to change its own self-processing mechanics at will__which all intelligent humans, can…
And, please don’t use my crazy ‘falling down the rat-holes’ crashes, as I experienced over the last few weeks, to compare how my brain works, most of the time__as I’m still searching out the person or reading material that sent me down that cross-wired path, I’m still recovering from__as I’m well aware of it happening, where I temporarily loose some self-control__far too much to my liking, at times… Also Tim, I’m not saying you ‘have’ to process your brain’s information in this exact fully dynamic manner, but it should at the least give you something to ponder, anew__and possibly see just why the brain may be oh so much more powerful(as to real information processing__i.e., thoughts) than either the brain-lacking geo-Universe, or a very dumb electronic computer… :-)
Higher order ideas, associations and concepts along with ever larger logical connections have a processing aspect of timing or perhaps a governing frequency threshold which establishes an aspect of the complexity by which mental connections are made, thus also the degree of intelligence.
Again here, I think the above said, more or less covers the many more logical connections’ possibilities by brains, over simple Universal functions and toy-computers__No…??? Tim, we don’t even begin to have the mathematical and scientific capacity to fully compute all the brain agents capacities__nor will we for many years to come__yet our statistical mechanics, applied to statistical probability analysis can do most of the math to understand most of the entire geo-Universe__not completely yet__but we’re far closer to mathematically understanding the geo-Universe, than to understanding the maths or complexities of the bio-Universe… This is true, hands-down, without debate…
I'm simply looking for connections between the bio/geo relationship at the brain/EM field interface. Such mechanics will always be more complex than I make them, but I cannot allow them to appear overly complex wihin my own mind whereby I get too intimidated to search for the connections which might actually be within my reach.
The simplest method I’d suggest Tim, is to search the childhood percept and concept mechanics, you used then__as early as you can go... Do you remember when you could see the actual functioning of your mental aura, reaching out in the room, and actually controlling your own protection circuits’ ability, to project itself outside the brain/body__to acturally mentally and physically change other older family members aggression states to more civil dialogues, toward others or yourself…? I certainly do__as I remember using it quite often, at those most tender ages, of somewhere around 2 to 4, if my memory visions are correct. I knew I could project me’ lil’ ol’ brain outside me’ brain/body, and I wish I had that power now__but nature seems to evolve us away from those early self-protection circuits, though I have noticed some of its similar nature returning of late__since I’ve run into some strange reactions from other people, that just ain’t normal__and it’s becoming far too often, to be mere coincidence, imo. It’s nothing serious, but too many people have just been too abnormally friendly to me, of late__especially as to the 78 year old member in my philosophy group, asking me to personally be his teacher, and teach him all I know about Pragmatism__and he’s serious, as we’ve now talked for some ten hours total, and not because he’s maybe lonely, as his wife’s still alive, and they get along great__Just strange that he’d recognize something I’d said, he wished to know far more about, and a few others have been asking me more questions than normal, also... It seems a lot like the old ‘acid days’, when cashiers everywhere were regularly giving me change for 100 dollar bills, when I’d only given em a ten… Wish that would start happening again… :-)
All in all Tim, imo, this is a mobile model of em-frequency field multiplications, simply by the ‘EM-I-Self’ being mobile__thus multiplying self-processing em-field capacities into real intelligence, imo… And imo, it’s still best represented by this single paragraph of Peirce’s, I’ve posted many times:
“Two things here are all-important to assure oneself of and to remember. The first is that a person is not absolutely an individual. His thoughts are what he is "saying to himself," that is, is saying to that other self that is just coming into life in the flow of time. When one reasons, it is that critical self that one is trying to persuade; and all thought whatsoever is a sign, and is mostly of the nature of language. The second thing to remember is that the man's circle of society (however widely or narrowly this phrase may be understood), is a sort of loosely compacted person, in some respects of higher rank than the person of an individual organism." C.S. Peirce
Tim imo, if you can just fully process this one paragraph, as to exactly what is meant__you will have fully understood the mobile model of all multiplied inter-acting field mechanics, within brains. It’s no more complex, than the full knowing states of this para… This is an em-frequency model of the brain’s inference mechanics, explained with fewer words than anyone else on Earth, I’ve ever come across…
And this graphic, by the living Russian__Lefebvre__shows the same in simple visual form...(Simply view em-fields as inter-acting between the 5 ovals, within the graphic, as relates to what I've written above, and also realize actual brain agent states have many more agents and a central processing agency, making use of the inter-actions of such multiplication of em-fields, all carrying information from the external world, and from memory, into our inference mechanics engine… If this level of mental investigation first puts you off, or scares you to steer clear, realize it's also scared many others away__even some of history's otherwise, most famous minds... I should also mention, each em-bio agent, has a real bio-physical location space, within the greater bio-em-perception space... This is all about the real action mechanics of physical objects, in real physical space, or the manifold of thought, and further, that each bio-em-agent represents one action of thought, at a time__as has been the history of logical semeiotics, for millennia... This is much like you're envisioning quantum mechanics' determinism of em-field mechanics passing through PSF points, but with the added twist of self-controllable dynamics of the em-fields within the intuition/perception thought manifold... My hypothesis is Tim, that muscles within the bio-intuitive/perception functioning mechanics of the brain, can and are actually self-controlled by us, to squeeze the PSF passage ways smaller and relax them larger__to control fundamental information flows of the em-carrying information photons, producing differing outcomes, we've learned to manipulate since birth__If this simple mechanical muscle process is multiplied by the number of possible existing agent fields inter-acting, the number of possible shapes of information becomes almost unlimited__It's simply producing a multiplycation of combinations of possibilities... Just my private model, though__meaning I'm the only one who's stated such, but it answers my personal investigations of how my intuitive/perception mechanics functions, when I just practice sizing items in my mind's eye, even as to simple triagles, circles and squares... I also practice on colored striped elephants, etc. and have questioned many others, to check my own results__They self-other-verify...)
(click to enlarge)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please let us know your logical, scientific opinions...