Translating Standard Model Concepts into the Parameters by which Information is Processed

I just got through looking over the article Lloyd and though I must admit to having a limited understanding of a few of the more technical aspects represented therein I think it goes far to giving such a technical approach to the more general expressions I’ve been trying to relate for a while. The main thing to keep in mind is that if such a discrete paradigm goes further to encompassing the various aspects of the Standard Model along with allowing ever further connections to biology, chemistry and the social sciences, then our own standards of the scientific methodology should require that it be found to be the more plausible explanation of our physical world. Though it may not be to such a stage in current form, I feel that such a discrete approach has the potential to do just that. Due to the interface of bio and geo nature as with the place at which our minds decipher the interactions of the physical world, it may be found that nature does not interact in such a discrete manner therefore having a more natural continuous functioning. However, if we find that our understanding of such mechanics comes by way of an analog to digital conversion of the values and interactions of nature within the mind itself whereby we might have a more intimate understanding of nature by following such avenues of reasoning, then ultimately the continuous aspects of nature are irrelevant to our very understanding and furthering of technology.

I think a lot of the problems of most people’s thought process with adopting such a paradigm is the mental conversion required to understand the relevance of such concepts. This process comes natural to my way of thinking for some reason and I feel that it is an advantage to my investigations. What I’m suggesting here is the required mindset needed to translate such standard model concepts as forces, mass, energy, thermodynamics, matter, space, time, velocity, etc, into mere functions of a more fundamental system of discrete information processing as discussed in the article in more technical details of how to possibly accomplish aspects of such. We learn of such things as gravity from Newton who gave us an idea of the effects of such a force and the deeply embedded role it plays in nature, while Einstein further brought us closer to understanding a potential mechanism of such a force by way of a physical continuum. This in turn structures our intimacy and familiarity to such interactions in the sense that it brought such from strictly the more familiar material aspects of existence e.g. planets, apples, etc. as provided by Newton to a unification of such materialistic aspects with the seemingly immaterial vacuum of space per Einstein’s spacetime manifold and the ability of matter to warp the very fabric of space itself to allow for gravitational interactions. Bringing the mind to a method of information processing whereby such a physically structured aspect of nature within our thoughts such as gravity can be translateed to be a mere consequence of how some form of discrete information is structurally stored, propagated, sorted and further exchanged within a matrix operating by way of a natural process which is further governed by the transmission of such information within a discrete operational speed limit whereby further consequences of such seemingly emerge from the paradigm which seemingly coincide with various other aspects we’ve come to know by way of modern science, is the key to having a truly intimate understanding of nature and our universe IMHO. Though science has taught us to visualize the interactions of our universe in a way that we have become familiar with as with the various autonomous entities from particle physics to astronomy bumping into each other throughout various distances of space, there is the ever present and much more plausible consideration that the way we view nature is not the way nature views itself.

In this scenario, nature would be interacting in such a way that our very understanding and visualization of such may actually be similar to a digital to analog conversion whereby though we may model our universe at the ever larger scales in a fashion which exhibits aspects of physical and interactive continuity, the underlying natural processes which allow for such modes of mental information processing are fundamentally discrete in nature. There is the potential for the division of the method of information processing of the only two natural systems in nature which display the processing of information as a consequence of their very design i.e. the universal system which establishes nature vs. the brain which interprets nature, whereby the functioning of one isn’t evidence to the mechanical functioning of the other as either method i.e. digital vs. analog could establish the other as with the universe creating the brain or with the brain interpreting the functioning of the universe. The universe could operate and arrange structured and unstructured systems in a digital or analog manner and still establish an internal system such as the brain which functioned in the opposite way, the same as the brain could operate and arrange structured and unstructured thoughts in either manner and still be correctly interpreting a universe which was functioning in the opposite manner with the correctness of such interpretations finding its balance by way of the scientific methodology whereby truth is evaluated rather than merely accepted.

As to your quote on energy Lloyd, “If the effective quantum is assigned the dimension ‘shifting process’, we obtain the dimension ‘shifting process per unit of time’ for energy…(First excellent definition of energy, I've ever seen...) ” It seems to be addressing what I was getting at the other day in a previous post when I said, “I am working on the implications of a discrete field per the frequency mechanics discussed before in terms of a reduction of all interactions to mere energy transferences amongst absolute regions of the fundamental field. Frequencies and wavelengths are reducible to quantitative aspects of energy as with E=hv. I’m simply suggesting here that the further reduction of frequency and wavelength interactions which oversee nature at the FS resolution may find themselves further reduced to how PSF domains interact and impose motion transferences upon each other.”

If we consider energy from the standpoint of such a matrix and properly translate it to a quantitative value of the changes and magnitude thereof taking place within regions of such within a given time, then we are fundamentally addressing how the system interacts in terms of the way it processes information in various regions along with the transference of such information from region to region thus also the effects of such upon other regions being processed. Simply put, when the system is establishing a structured system within a localized region, this is when the system becomes more visible to us as with differentiating matter from space. We may not see every little interaction down to the Planck scales, but its obvious that there is a distinction going on within such a region whereby the interactions thereof are much different than would be those which establish and calculate mere space. The more the system is committed to structuralization within a localized region, the less it is effecting other various non local regions outwardly and the more its motions are concentrated inwardly. It’s as if information is being stored and moved in larger quantities as a single unit i.e. mass rather than being dispersed throughout the system. E=mc² effectively becomes a relationship of the magnitude at which one form or region of processing can effect another throughout the system. There is no true autonomy or autonomous structures within such a system whereby changes of state within one area of the matrix are required to be absorbed by others whereby altering the state of various other structured systems due to the actions of one. Sometimes rather than a dismantling of a structured system it is just the mere presence of such a system which alters aspects of others such as trajectory as two systems compete for the same absolute position within the matrix, thus causing them both to have to be processed simultaneously which ends up in the various forces we witness along with their characteristics of repulsion, attraction, orbit, etc. thus also establishing the mechanism by which the values of such interactions are so consistent throughout the known universe, which is why we are yet to find such things as a less massive object enforcing its will upon a more massive object in a collision unless the velocity of the lesser is great enough to accomplish such, which is also a further aspect of the magnitude and dynamics by which information is transferred within such a matrix.

This is just an example of how such concepts of modern physics can potentially be translated in a general sense to aspects of a digital system of information processing whereby scientific aspects emerge as consequences of a natural process. It could potentially be how nature works or it could be potentially how the processes of the mind are able to perceive it working. Either way, much work would have to be done to bring it from a general description to a quantitative one whereby science might judge its relevance or the lack thereof, but until I see something such as a larger stellar body orbiting a much smaller one somewhere in the universe which would cause me to have to reevaluate my understanding of physics itself, my form of mental processing will probably always lean towards understanding the universal system in such discrete terms.