Macro and Micro Conservation Mechanics, cont....

Exactly Lloyd,

When you change your velocity relative to c, you still get a value of c per the quantum ruler/clock analogy within your frame, thus you can't determine that you're in an inertial reference frame or your velocity within such by way of measuring the velocity of light. At much slower velocities, sound and other such waves do allow for this. However, it is the frequency and wavelength which dopler shift as with universal expansion observations of stars, whereby the visible light spectrum to an observer on Earth at it's velocity increases in frequency and decreases in wavelength due to your relational motions whereby such light becomes gamma rays relative to you at near c velocities. This energy is relational to the concentration of motion within an absolute position within an absolute time. The lower frequency light waves weren't delivering harmful radiation until you accelerated your frame which compresses more total motion within your moving temporal and spatial co-ordinates. Your frames wavelengths reciprocally get increasingly longer thus lowering in frequency within the various combined motion axes of the composite structures as could be ploted by a graph of x,y axis. Thus, we have spatially and temporally homogeneous conservation motion mechanics due to absolute time and space, whereby the mass and time values are determined by c velocity ratios and the total position values are determined against all internal constituent systems thus all internal states are found relational to all others.
Within an accelerated frame, the rate at which such EM frequencies change are relational to acceleration.

If you would, just go through and add my comments to the blog as you see fit to keep the flow of the conversation. I'm emailing by phone and haven't had time to get familiar with the blog yet, which I would rather do on my home computer. I'm not concerned about who we share our ideas with cause if we are right then such truths should be shared, though I would like for us to get credit for our efforts as would anyone. Some of what I realized actually came by way of Dave's interpretation of internal relative to rest mass, but I didn't get a chance to take it further with him, but I must acknowledge his contribution to my thought process. I just couldn't get him to see the inverse external conservation which we're exploring and now see.

Tim Lester