Macro and Micro Conservation Mechanics, cont...

Yea...I think the extreme ends of Relativistic effects are potentially
unattainable, but I think the mechanics are important. I think I may
have had a breakthrough which can be mathematically modeled and this
is an example of how I would apply RM to QM. I'll need your help
though. It has to do with the rad decay mechanics, photon modeling and
the conservation aspects I've been discussing. Let me get it worked up
better, but basically it's modeling all photons as linear with no
divergence or lateral motion which is counter intuitive to them being
modeled as a sine wave. The frequency/wavelength thus energy is in the
frequency of generation as with the electron being somewhat analogous
to an AC generator and the sine wave produced by an electrical AC
generator being translated as mere oscillations within the electrons
of the wire whereby they don't go through the circuit as does DC but
rather oscillate in sync with the changing magnetic field with a
limited range of motion. I'm still speaking from FS terms and not
going into the PSF so we can consider volumes to move within volumes
per structured matter and 3d wave motions with EM radiation. The
frequency of AC is relation to the RPM's of the generator.

Tesla had the advantage over Edison per electrical transmission as AC
propagates with far less losses and is much easier to step up and
down. With DC electrons move through the circuit from negative to
positive. With AC they just form an Aether type medium which
oscillates. Applying such to EM radiation means that all energy level
photons can have the same velocity and can be modeled with zero
divergence along a graph axis corresponding to c which equates to
minimal mass and time. Thus if we treat the nucleus of an atom as a
mass system with a velocity of some ratio of c then it'll have a
corresponding amplitude or lateral divergence which can be treated as
mass and time phenomena in RM. Now the constituents of the nucleus
would have there own graph lines, but we can treat them as a unified
mass object whereby exploring this recursive relationship at the
electron resolution. Do the same graphing for the electron whereby
deriving its later frequency thus mass value and then curl the
electrons line around the nucleus and calculate the effects of
acceleration of the atom as a whole by way of each constituents graph
line. The electron would be going through two axis of motion while the
nucleus just goes through one. Thus, the electron would have to
satisfy the same amplitude relationship along the nucleus axis as the
nucleus, while reciprocally effecting its orbital axis. This means
that rest mass can stay equal due to any increase in the relative mass
and energy along the nucleus axis causing a reciprocal decrease in
amplitude along the electron axis due to conserved c, with rest mass
equaling the sum of both axis whereby staying consistent through
various velocities. We must consider that rest mass is a positive
effect of divergence whereby relative mass increase due to velocity is
a negative back pressure effect of the FS field required for any
further acceleration throughout/within thus effecting the energy
required to do so. This could be graphed as a function of changing
from the collective mass graph of one velocity to a change in velocity
of the same system. I'll be more clear shortly but the conservation
aspect is there. The photons just need to be pulses whereby we can
graph the rest per lateral divergence due to velocity being conserved
laterally when not used linearly, which sets up the rest of the
relationships as per energy being a value of the quantity of motion
imposed upon a region within an absolute time per the mass, momentum
and frequency relationships to energy. With the photon, planks
constant is the ratio due to the pulses, but with structured mass, cc
is the ratio due to all the curled up trajectories whereby mcc is a
measure of volume ie LWH or the one for a sphere or whatever. I'll get
it straight.

Mainly, just consider the most constituent systems as being graphed in
a linear manner with equivalent amplitudes, frequencies and
wavelengths representing energy, mass, etc. Now curl those
relationships into structures with various axes of motion whereby
allowing the constituent relationships to be localized in an orbital
region whereby having an added conservation effect of conserving
another axis of motion while also conserving the constituent axis.
Consider the changes required along the various axes required to
conserve changes along others. I'll work on this further but I hope
you get my general intent.

Tim Lester